IF Mid-EAST war ends, to end the MYANMAR CIVIL WAR could become the TARGET of TRUMP to get NOBLE PEACE PRIZE!
Now a days, R2P, SAFE ZONE, UNSC, UNGA etc became USELESS & a JOKE for Myanmars because of China/Russia VETOS
“It is also possible for the UN, under Article 6 of the UN Charter, to eject members who have persistently violated its principles, but that requires the support of the Security Council (and the United States). In the 1970s, there were repeated attempts to expel South Africa from the UN; these efforts were vetoed by the US, France and the UK.
“However, the General Assembly passed a resolution declaring that it simply wouldn’t recognise South Africa’s credentials, effectively banning it for 20 years. It is time for the Assembly to consider undertaking the same action with regard to Israel.”- Michael Lynk
1950 UNGA passed the Uniting for Peace Resolution to intervene in Korea to avoid vetoed by USSR. Now the time is ripe for Myanmar
What could individual states do without the UN?
“There are no good answers here. Concepts like humanitarian intervention and the responsibility to protect have generated a lot of interest since the 1990s, but it remains the mainstream view that the lawful use of force requires UN Security Council authorisation or a valid claim of self-defence.
“The 1948 Genocide Convention obligates all parties to prevent genocide, but this does not provide a standalone legal basis for forcible intervention.
“Another consideration is collective self-defence or the similar concept of ‘intervention by invitation’. This possibility depends on Palestine being recognised as a state that can exercise its sovereignty by inviting third states to participate in a campaign of self-defence against Myanmar Junta..
How to Win the Friendship of Donald Trump and Influence the U.S. Administration
Beijing’s Myanmar Gambit: Why Trump and Anwar Must Confront China, Not Each Other
Exclusive: Trump team hears pitches on access to Myanmar’s rare earths
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 377 (V)
United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) resolution 377 A,[1] the “Uniting for Peace” resolution, states that in any cases where the Security Council, because of a lack of unanimity among its five permanent members (P5), fails to act as required to maintain international security and peace, the General Assembly shall consider the matter immediately and may issue appropriate recommendations to UN members for collective measures, including the use of armed force when necessary, in order to maintain or restore international security and peace. It was adopted 3 November 1950, after fourteen days of Assembly discussions, by a vote of 52 to 5, with 2 abstentions.[2] The resolution was designed to provide the UN with an alternative avenue for action when at least one P5 member uses its veto to obstruct the Security Council from carrying out its functions mandated by the UN Charter.
To facilitate prompt action by the General Assembly in the case of a deadlocked Security Council, the resolution created the mechanism of the emergency special session (ESS).[3] Emergency special sessions have been convened under this procedure on eleven occasions, with the most recent convened in February 2022, to address Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. However, unlike the preceding ESSs, the tenth ESS and the eleventh ESS have been ‘adjourned’ and ‘resumed’ on numerous occasions over the past several years, and remain temporarily adjourned. Indeed, more than ten separate ‘plenary meetings’ have been held by the Assembly, whilst sitting in the tenth ESS since 2000, and over twenty, whilst sitting in the eleventh ESS since 2022.[4]
